Friday, July 10, 2020

Our Perversely Pervasive Neglect of Persuasion, part 1


We cast down imaginations and every high thing that exalts itself against God and bring every thought captive to the obedience of Christ.     (2 Corinthians 10:5)

               It is an underlying assumption of our time that the foundations which ensured the multitudes of blessings our society has enjoyed up to now, will continue to refresh and refurbish civilizations’ engines into the future.  This expectation applies not only to our deliberations over earth-bound governance, but also to the persuasion of hearts and minds with respect to the Kingdom of God.  Both challenges are connected.  This view assumes that such principles as were successful in the past can spring from out of either anywhere or nowhere, when in fact they can only be expected to arise from that single source which alone has both the power (of the Holy Spirit) and the logical potential to nourish free societies which express moral, rational, and spiritual principles.  The reason is that the human exchanges required to achieve this goal are both highly complex, and they differ in kind from physical (materialistic) laws. 
One of the firmest laws of science in the realm of physics is the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics which holds that all physical entities and the interactions between them are cooling off, wearing out, and/or becoming increasingly random when limited to their own resources.  Yet even so, this same inclination also applies to civilizations, societies, and individuals.[1]  Note the following observations:
               We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion…Our nation was made only for a holy and religious people.  It is totally inadequate to the governance of another.”[2]
               What reason do we have to suppose that our civilization, in contrast to civilizations which have preceded it, will endure?”  The person who has not faced this question is hardly alive.  That many different ways of life have flourished and have then declined is beyond contradiction.  Consequently, there is no high probability that the fate of our civilization will be different—unless….  The precise character of this ‘unless’ is of such importance as to attract and to hold our best thinking…It is our most urgent question.[3]
               Civilization is hideously fragile, you know that; and there’s not much between us and the horrors beneath, just about a coat of varnish, wouldn’t you say?”[4]
               Where did the doing without God end but in the undoing of man through the anger of God?”[5]
Our nation in recent decades has been divided politically almost exactly 50/50 percent.  Yet in our day, the means of publicly seeking desired outcomes in social governance is rapidly drifting away from changing people’s minds to instead fixating on strategic manipulation.  With the exception of just a few commentators on radio and television,  I fear that many conservative spokespersons either cannot, or will not, articulate the intellectual foundations which undergird conservativism.  Others weaken the same message by distancing themselves from any necessary connection to our Maker and Redeemer.[6]                                                              To be continued  



[1] Romans 1:18-32.  Notice that the effective means of this decline is not God’s decree, but His giving humans over to their own devices.
[2] From John Adams, to the Massachusetts Militia on October 11, 1798, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/99-02-02-3102
[3] Elton Trueblood. The Company of the Committed. (Harper and Brothers, 1961), p. 2
[4] C.P. Snow. A Coat of Varnish. (Scribner’s, 1979).
[5] Augustine, The City of God. (Image, 1958), p. 543.
[6] Russel Kirk. The Roots of American Order. (Regnery Gateway, 1991), pp. 462,3. Referring to Orestes Brownson, Kirk wrote, “Justice requires…the authority of religious truth…Without authority vested somewhere, without moral principles that may be consulted confidently, Justice cannot long endure anywhere. Yet modern liberalism and democracy are contemptuous of the whole concept of moral authority.

No comments:

Post a Comment