“For I delivered to you
as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins in
accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the
third day…and that he appeared…” (1 Corinthians 15:3-5)
The passage just cited includes the two words, “delivered”
and “received.” The Apostle Paul is here
noting that the passage found in 1 Corinthians 15:3b-8 (I encourage you to read
the entire section), is not his own words.
He is instead passing on to his readers what amounts to a credal statement
that he received from the Christian community as a whole. This statement concerning Jesus’ death,
burial, and resurrection was already in circulation when Paul chose to
incorporate it into his own letter.
There are two matters of importance here. First, the central message of Christianity
right from the very beginning revolved around these three words (themes). Second, this passage is dated between three
and five years after Jesus’ crucifixion.
This time frame is assumed not (only) by fundamentalist Christians, but by a body of radical skeptical
scholars (the “Jesus Seminar”) who deny the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection
from the dead (Robert Funk, ed. The Acts of Jesus: What Did Jesus Really
Do? (Polebridge, 1982), p.454)). Indeed, this is the broadly agreed upon time
frame across New Testament scholarship.
It is important to recognize that the 3-5-year time-frame
just cited does not mean that this was the date when the resurrection stories were
invented. It means instead that
documentable evidence for a publically-agreed upon creed was already in broad
circulation by that time. Three to five
years is how amazingly close in time we can approach concrete, primary
documentation for Christian belief about Jesus resurrection from the dead. The so-called gap in time between the alleged
event (the resurrection) and widely-held conviction about that event is utterly
without parallel in ancient history. There
is absolutely no reason to think that within the remaining tiny gap of time that
the story of Easter was invented out of nothing.
I wish to separate the question of legend from myth for
reasons that I will explain in future blogs.
But for the present I include quotations from literary scholars, who treat both together, who
argue that legendary development does not happen immediately. To the contrary, it is documented to take
generations. Consider the following:
“”The agnostic type of
form-criticism would be much more credible if the compilation of the Gospels
were much later in time than can be the case…Heroditus enables us to test the
tempo of myth-making, [showing that] even two generations are too short a span
to allow the mythical tendency to prevail over the hard historic core.” (A.N.
Sherwin-White. Roman Law and Roman Society in the New Testament. (Oxford,
1962), p.189,90).
“Myth is usually
characterized by remoteness in time and space…as having taken place long ago.” The Gospels by contrast concern “an event that had a particular definite
location in Palestine…under Pontius Pilate, only a generation or so before the
New Testament account of these happenings.”
(John Macquarie. God
Talk: An Examination of the Language and Logic of Theology. (Harper and
Row, 1967), p.177, 180).
No comments:
Post a Comment