Friday, August 7, 2020

In What Way is "Science the Answer"?

 

(My letter to The Daily American newspaper (Somerset PA) as a reply to their guest editorial from the St. Louis Dispatch titled “Science the Answer,” dated August 3, 2020.  I was limited to 250 words.)

Although science indeed is the answer to strictly scientific concerns, it cannot be the entire answer to considerations which cross over into non-scientific, yet equally consequential, realms.  With respect to the Covid-19 onslaught, these relevant non-scientific concerns include pursuing broad-scale economic vitality that is necessary for funding societal needs, seeking quality education for students of all ages, and encouraging businesses of all kinds which will not only secure households financially, but also ensure commerce in general so that societies will thrive.  Insofar as these vital aspects of life are neglected, societies will begin failing.  It is no slam on science to acknowledge that its insights cannot, by itself, address whether risking the reopening of social venues is or is not wise.  Since that decision is not as black-or-white as the editorial suggested, its authors’ venomous attacks on President Trump actually reflect insufficient reflection on the part of the editors.

               Indeed, Leftists routinely turn their own blind eye to scientific facts that are not ambiguous.  Firstly, the pro-choice claim that a fetus is an integral part of its mother’s body is contradicted by the scientific facts that its blood type and genome each differ from the mother’s.  Secondly, for purposes of relaxing social restroom and shower-facility boundaries, Leftists give priority to transgender’s subjecttive sense of their sexual identity as opposed to the objective scientific indicators which include both one’s anatomy and their DNA code.  To make matters worse, the scientific community in both cases remains silent over such non-science.

Sincerely,

Gary Jensen, Pastor

No comments:

Post a Comment