I am not arguing that the scientific community is coming to
Christianity en mass on account of
the Big Bang paradigm. While it is true
that the number of scientists (especially astronomers and physicists)
responding favorably to the Gospel is increasing for the very reasons I have
described in recent blogs, resistance to religious faith remains strong. Because our culture tends to measure value in
terms of popularity and numbers, it is tempting to question religious belief
(Christianity in particular) in the absence of the “scientific vote of approval.”
If the Big Bang has such strong positive implications in favor of God as
creator (Genesis 1:1), then why doesn’t the chorus of Christian believers
include more outspoken scientists?
It is important therefore that we hold scientists
accountable by asking of them the right questions. And scientists, in the name of the scientific
method, ought to welcome this. The problem before us is not a matter of science
against religion. Neither is it a
problem of faith in conflict with reason.
Science is a very laudable field of study (and a very broad one it is!). The Bible actually demands that we pay
attention to (and not suppress) the witness of the natural order (Romans
1:18-23). The real challenge is instead
that scientists are human beings just like the rest of us. As with us all, scientists have the same
kinds of private ambitions (including over protection of one’s turf) as the
population in general. In the same way
that “possessing” a Bible is no guarantee that an adherent to their religion
will act in a God-pleasing manner (Romans 2:17-24, so also the title “scientist”
is no guarantee, in itself, that the same person will follow the scientific
method consistently. This is no slam
against scientists! This truth about
human nature is the very reason the scientific method is held up as the goal,
even as it is adhered to imperfectly.
When certain scientists argue that the Big Bang does not
point to a transcendent Creator, we are all entitled to ask, “Exactly
why?” Certain kinds of answers tend to
follow from the mouths of skeptics on this matter. Exactly what these “answers” are will be
examined next.
No comments:
Post a Comment