Fox News Alone Visually Connects Rioting with the Democrat Party, part 2

 “A lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies” (Tennyson)

           

            As for the core question of blame, if the image aspect of the videos was the sincere reason that they are censored (on the grounds that pure violence ought not be shown), it would still be reasonable to expect the same networks to verbally correct the record with respect to the truth.  Their failure to do so invalidates that excuse, especially so, since their commentary consistently favors only the Democrat Party.  Yet in reality their employment of a double-standard in this respect is proved even more glaringly insincere by their refusal to shield even children from exposure to internet pornographic images.  The fact of the matter is that visual images in general have a capacity to affirm aspects of objective truth that can be achieved by no other means. 

By the exclusion of this indicator of reality, the question of adjudicating between differing opinions and perceptions is often reduced to “he said/she said” dead-ends.  The question, for example, of when Joe Biden first denounced violence and distinguished it from “peaceful” protest (either at the time of George Floyd’s death or only 90-some days later) can only be decisively answered by chronicled video-documentation.  Likewise the nature of the interchanges between President Trump and Democrat mayors concerning discerning their level of culpability in regard to the unopposed murderous and destructive riots, can be easily settled; yet only by video documentation.  For similar reasons, the authenticity of statements by “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) spokespersons, that the rampant looting and destruction of property wrought in its name does not count as vandalism, but merely represents valid “reparations” (payback) from our nation’s past guilt of employing slavery, is provable; yet only if the recordings of their rhetoric gets aired.  In the same way, nothing can convict the true hypocrisy of BLM, other than video records of its members intimidating helpless 80-year old men and women!  This travesty is further heightened by the failure of BLM to either renounce or apologize for, such tactics. 

To be clear, the case concerning each the above circumstances is strong enough to convince a jury informed under the rigor of a legal trial in court where decisions are often made on the basis of other kinds of evidence.  The concern of this paper is persuading voters whose only priority is sending in their ballot for President before even the first public debate between the candidates has been held.   

That non-Fox outlets habitually accuse both Fox News and Trump’s administration of “fanning the flames” which destroy property and lives, is an utterly absurd ploy.  Yet such nonsense can only be exposed by opening the curtain for all the world to see.  Not only the doers of these deeds, but also all who withhold their witness from the voting public, are enemies of the truth.  If you, on the other hand, seek to know the truth to the end that truth will win out, you can see it played out on Fox News only!