On the basis of such relevant recent scientific evidence
just described, questions of the biblical view of creation continue in their importance. A resurrected Christ who is left, pardon the
pun, “hanging mid-air,” (that is, un-linked to other biblical truths) is NOT
adequate to save. But Christianity doesn’t
teach that anyway. Christianity says
Jesus is our savior from sin precisely because He is God, and by “god” we don’t
mean just “any old god.” The Bible does
not call readers to believe in a generic “god.” To the contrary it calls us to distinguish
between idols (false gods that are limited by definition and non-existent in any
case) which tempt people of every culture and time, on the one hand, and, on
the other, the only true and living God who both “made heaven and earth” at the
beginning of time (Genesis 1:1), and in the fullness of time entered our world in
the flesh in Jesus Christ (John 1:14).
An inadequate view of creation logically leads to an inadequate conception of the weight of
the saving power of Christ in the blood He shed on the cross. Because He is God, God the Son, who “in the beginning” made “all things” (John 1:1,2), the blood of
the “Lamb of God who takes away the sins
of the world,” therefore avails for every
sin and every sinner from all time who receives Him by faith (John 1:12). No being of lesser stature would be able to
accomplish that task. This is why I do
not consider matters of creation unimportant.
In itself the doctrine of creation is not adequate for salvation. But
an adequate conception of creation is necessary
for the robust doctrine of Christ’s redemption according to the Bible.
No comments:
Post a Comment