“When I look into the
heavens…what is man that you are mindful of him?” (Psalm 8:3,4)
I am reading Martin Rees’ treatise, Just Six Numbers: The
Deep Forces That Shape the Universe. (Basic, 2000). It is a wonderfully written book that is a
delight to read. Although the author has
a different worldview from mine, he does not write with an axe to grind. He is gracious and indeed respectful to
people who disagree with him philosophically, including Christian physicist,
Dr. John Polkinghorne (p.150). In spite
of his “naturalistic” (for my definition see my previous posting) philosophical
commitments pertaining to cosmogony (the
study of the origin of the universe),
Dr. Rees embraces a set of perspectives on the history and structure of the
cosmos that are broadly shared by the entire scientific community, including
theists (those believe the God of the Bible is the intelligent creator and
designer behind the Big Bang creation of all things out of nothing).
The significance of the “just six numbers” that are found in
his book title will be the theme of my next posting. Today I wish to address something a bit
lighter in contents. Have you considered
the concept, “powers of ten?” For our
reflection, Dr. Rees lays out in his chapter titled “The Cosmos and the MicroWorld,” the relative size of human beings
when we measured against the size of the entire cosmos by using the “powers of
ten” comparison study. The “powers of ten”
exercise begins with the snapshot from a distance of two meters of a man and a woman
lying on a lawn in a park. Each
successive photo aimed at the couple covers ten times the area covered by the
previous shot. By the time the
photographer arrives at the tenth frame, the field of the photo covers an area the
size of our Sun. Then, returning back to
the couple on the lawn, photos aimed at the couple, ten in all, are now taken of
an area ten times smaller than the previous photo, and so-on and so-on. By the time of the tenth frame, amazingly, the
field of the final picture is the size of an atom.
Dr. Rees concludes, “This
‘human scale’ is, in a numerical sense, poised midway between the masses of
atoms and stars. It would take roughly
as many human bodies to make up the mass of the Sun as there are atoms in each
of us….We straddle the cosmos and the microwold—intermediate in size between
the Sun, at a billion metres in diameter, and a molecule at a billionth of a
meter. It is actually no coincidence
that nature attains its maximum complexity on this intermediate scale: anything
larger, if it were on a habitable planet, would be vulnerable to breakage or crushing
by gravity” (pp.6,7).
No comments:
Post a Comment