Thursday, March 3, 2022

Sins, Sin, and the Only Way of Redemption, Part One

                                          Getting the Real Point of Ash Wednesday and Lent

               It is the morning of the Day of Carnival as I begin writing this article.  The term “Carnival,” which is a prominent name of the  Christian festival held on the Tuesday immediately before Ash Wednesday,” literally means “farewell to meat (carne).”  Carnival is intended to mark, in the name of Christ, the final “happy” celebration prior to the Lenten season of renunciation of a long list of pleasures that includes eating red meat.  For this reason it is traditional for many Christians to pick their own pet pleasure and personally deny it until Easter Sunday (as the day of Christ’s resurrection it ends the Season of Lent).  Now I for one am of two minds in regard to the season of Lent.  On the one hand, in-so-far-as it points ahead in our Church calendar to Jesus’ death on the cross on Good Friday, then this season about that focus is extremely powerful in directing our personal priorities.  There is a very real sense in which Lent is a penitential season.  On the other hand, I consider this matter of renunciation a complicated issue.  Why, for example, do our liturgies remove all celebratory aspects of worship for both Lent and Advent (L&A), including the “Glory to God in the Highest”?  For three reasons I judge these omissions to be  wrong-headed!  Firstly, since Christ is risen from the dead, in the context of our worship (including L&A) we today have every confidence that Jesus lives and reigns and rules today!  Secondly, in light of Easter we hold that, despite the awful historical reality of the crucifixion, the symbol of the cross now looms as the very power of God for our salvation even in the past but also in the present (Romans 6:3,4).  Thirdly, the traditional ploy of renouncing generally a single one of our vices, utterly misses the point of what the Gospel of Jesus Christ calls every single person to do.  Further it also understates the necessity of Jesus’ death on the cross as the only means our receiving forgiveness and redemption (John 14:6).

               As the title of this essay implies, the word “sin” in one vital context is expressed in two forms: in the plural “sins,” and in the singular, “sin.”  On the one hand both forms share the same meaning which is literally falling “short of the glory [purposes] of God” (Romans 3:23a).  Now for the three distinctions:

1.      “Sins” (in the plural) represent specific ways in which we “fall short of the glory of God.”  In Lutheran liturgies in particular we confess that we “have sinned in thoughts, words, and deeds, by the things we have done and the things we have not done” and “we have not loved you [God] with our whole heart and we have not loved our neighbors as ourselves.”  The list of specific verbal moral obligations include the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20), but also include our inner thoughts (Matthew 5).  The same pattern includes the example of our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Peter 2:21).  As if this is not hard enough, St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans further highlights convicting standards that are knowable even to people who never open a Bible.  Examples include firstly 1:18-32 which indicates that evading truth places one under God’s judgment.  Secondly, 2:1-5 warns that people who judge others by a standard of their own making will render themselves liable to God’s judgment under that same standard (also “Matthew 7:2).  In conclusion, none of us have any grounds to prevail before God’s holy standard with our record of sins (Isaiah 64:6).

2.      The word “sin” (in the singular) denotes the fundamental objectionable feature of sin which is our self-centeredness as opposed to God’s will that we be God-centered.  The is, “sIn” has been described as the “great I disease” in which we reframe our demands to center around the “me, myself, and I.”  This posture is effectively an act of rebellion against the rightful authority of God by which He is rightfully the Master of all creation.  This isn’t an arbitrary demand by a tyrannical despot, but a rational expectation in an orderly and harmonious creation in the same way that beautiful orchestral music can only happen when every player follows the lead of the conductor.




No comments:

Post a Comment