Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Why Didn't God Talk "Scientific?" part I

“And the earth was without form and void.”  (Genesis 1:2)

In his wonderful book, Your God is Too Small, J.B. Phillips imagines an occasion (which I cannot perfectly reconstruct) where a teacher asks his classroom of teens whether or not God understands nuclear physics.  After the students retorted with a quick “no!” they suddenly laughed at their answer in the recognition that if God exists at all He must understand literally everything.  How, after all, would it be possible for an ignorant buffoon to create out of nothing such a beautiful and complex cosmos as ours?
There are a host of indicators that the God of the Bible also encourages our understanding of the things that He has made.  I have repeatedly referred to Romans 1:18-20 as a pointer to the importance God places on our honest and careful exploration of the natural order.  Contrary to popular opinion, nowhere in all of Scripture are people ever commanded to diminish nature in favor of belief in God.  We are instead called to affirm God’s transcendent (meaning to stand outside and above) superintendence over and above nature.  In 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (“Test all things”) the Apostle Paul lays foundation for the legitimacy and importance of the scientific method in the exploration of our world.  It is widely acknowledged that it was a specifically Christian world view that provided impetus for the disciplined (as opposed to hit-and-miss) exploration of the natural order that we now call the scientific enterprise.  For further study on these matters consider University of Washington Sociology Professor, Rodney Stark’s book, For the Glory of God: How Monotheism Led to Reformations, Science, Witch-Hunts, and the End of Slavery. (Princeton, 2003), ch.2.  
Clearly God fully understands every single aspect of His creation (Psalm 19:1f).  In my previous blog I highlighted the truth that His Word found in the Holy Bible anticipated two profound realities of Big Bang cosmology by over twenty-five centuries, including firstly the absolute beginning of the universe out of nothing, and secondly, the fact that the universe is continuously expanding ever since that beginning. 
It is also immediately clear, however, that when we turn to the first chapters of the “Book of Genesis,” we are not reading a scientific textbook.  Mathematical formulas are nowhere to be found.  Nothing anywhere reads like “Scientific American” magazine.  The modes of expression in the first chapters of Genesis in particular are of a phenomenal nature (e.g. “the sun rises in the east”), as opposed to being analytical (e.g. “the earth rotates around the sun”) in nature.  For these reasons critics habitually dismiss as worthless the text of Genesis for being primitive, pre-scientific mythology.  In an upcoming blog I will make the case that, to the contrary, it was the Book of Genesis and not science that first repudiated mythology by replacing the so-called gods of nature with, I repeat, the Transcendent, Almighty, and Omniscient God.
To be continued...
 

No comments:

Post a Comment