“However, as it is
written, ‘No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has
prepared for those who love him’ — but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit”
(1 Corinthians
2:9,10).
I have been married to my one and only wife for over 32
wonderful years. With the ongoing
passage of time I am learning more and more things about her that I love. One thing, however, I’ve discovered that “pushes
her buttons” (which is not a good thing for me to do!), is my attempt to be
silly by recounting a list of obscure things I admire about her while she is
simply trying to get my attention by talking to me. There is of course no question that she
appreciates my compliments about her outward beauty. But the bottom line is, when my wife is
speaking to me, I ought to listen! When
it comes to the most important realities of life, that is personal
relationships, empirical analysis is not enough. “Empiricism” is the belief that all knowledge
is derived by our five senses (sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch) and can
be measured. Such analysis plays a very
important role in understanding my (our) material world. But it isn’t enough. I must open my ears, and paying attention,
actually listen to what my beloved says about her perceptions, feelings, and wishes. This insight, of course, is hardly a revolutionary
revelation. Yet a deeper appreciation of
revelation within relationships does have the power to revolutionize the
latter!
The deservedly famous philosopher Immanuel Kant argued for
the existence of God on the basis of the “Categorical [moral] Imperative,”
stating that the concept of God follows logically from human moral obligation. At the same time, Kant (ironically, “Immanuel”
means literally, “God with us”) rejected the concept of revelation. By that term he was specifically rejecting revealed religion. Kant argued that the legitimate insights
about God must be limited to observations from the natural world. Revelation plays no legitimate role in these
questions. From his time onward the
concept of revelation has been held under suspicion. Yet in reality, there is no legitimate
argument against the concept of revelation.
There is nothing that science proper has to say with respect to this
possibility. And indeed, the rejection
of this possibility, leads to the impoverishment of all thinking, not just “religious” thinking.
In my previous blog I cited an atheist who, in a recent debate,
argued from the demonstrated falsity of Mormonism and Islam, to the conclusion that
Christianity also is illegitimate. In that
attempt he committed the logical fallacy called “affirming the consequent.” The suggestion that all revelation is false
because not all religions are right is as absurd as suggesting that no one ever
tells the truth because today’s newspaper stated that someone lied in court. Sifting out falsehood from the truth demands moving beyond prejudice by doing the hard work of investigating the facts of the case.
That God exists at all is important, but it doesn’t to tell
the whole story. I embrace the Bible’s
claim to be the revealed Word of God (2 Timothy 3:16, John 1:1-3, 14, and
Hebrews 1:1-3). As the Gospel of John
further fleshes out, the Creator of the heavens and the earth came into our
world in Jesus Christ. It is from this
revelation that we learn the character of this God, namely that the One who
stretched out the heavens at the beginning of time, in Christ came in love for the entire
world to stretch out His arms on a cross in the fullness of time. And in the present time He extends His arms
to receive all who will come to Him (Matthew 11:28,29). This truth is the most important one of all if true. The concept of such a revelation is not inconsistent with
the revelation between human beings that happens as we reveal our thoughts to each another in
daily conversation. The assertion that
God cannot reveal Himself to us effectively relegates Him to a stature that is
lower than us. And that suggestion is
worst than irrational. It leads to the impoverishment of all of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment