Thursday, January 10, 2013

Still Not Enough Planets, part II


The list continues from my previous blog of those physical requirements that allow a planet to be habitable for intelligent life:

To shield harmful radiation from the Galaxy core, our sun must be shielded from the core by gas clouds.

The sun must be neither too close to the core and its harmful radiation…

...nor too far from the core, which would prevent the reception of radiation that is necessary for life’s existence.

Our sun must lie outside the galaxy arms, though not too far from them.

Our sun must orbit the galaxy core at the same rate as both the neighboring arms and stars so that collisions will be avoided.

It must not lie above (or below) the orbital plane in such a way that radiation from the galaxy core would hit it directly (much like getting hit by a squirt gun while stealing a peak over the top of your friend’s fence).

For gravitational stability purposes our sun must be a single star.  80% of known stars exist as doubles in gravitational relationship with either other.

It is required that we be neither too far from, nor too close to, (the variation allowable within just a few percentage points).

It is necessary that our planet have very close to a 365 day rotation cycle.

For stability purposes it is necessary that there are neighboring planets revolving around our sun in the same plane as our own planet.

For our protection from harmful debris we need a “Jupiter” kind of planet of such a size that its gravitational power draws harmful asteroids and meteors away from us and into its own sphere.

For both our stability as a planet and for our tidal cycle, we need our moon to be just the size it is and revolving around our planet at its current duration.

For gravitational reasons, our moon must remain at its current distance from the earth.

For the proper flow of the seasons we need our rotational tilt as a planet to be just what it is, even as it must remain at the speed that it is.

For gravitational reasons our planet must be just the size it actually is, so that it allows water vapor (molecular weight 18) while allowing methane (16) and ammonia (17) to dissipate.

It is necessary that a habitable planet have a radioactive core which produces necessary minerals underground…

...and plate tectonics for the creation both of continents and mountains…

and also earthquakes for the continual recycling of necessary minerals below ground back up onto the surface of the earth.  Apart from plate tectonics a planet is uninhabitable for life.

A magnetic core is required that produces a shield capable of protecting earth from the sun’s harmful radiation.

We have just begun to scratch the surface of the matter.  The point is, the existence of a planet that is capable of being a wonderful home for intelligent life is a matter greater than throwing a couple of factors together.  The scientific community has gathered a total of at least 75 separate requirements for life to exist anywhere in the universe.  The odds in favor of the occurrence of nearly every one of these is very small since they lie within an extremely narrow range of acceptable limits.  The estimated odds for each and every factor (ponder this on your own) all multiply on every one of the other factors.  Astronomer Dr. Hugh Ross has noted that when all of these realities are factored together the result is “Much less than one chance in a hundred thousand, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, exists that even one such planet would occur anywhere in the universe.”  For your consideration I encourage you to check out his website, “Reasons to Believe,” at www.reaasons.org.

No comments:

Post a Comment